4.1 Review

Pilomatrixoma: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOPATHOLOGY
卷 40, 期 9, 页码 631-641

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/DAD.0000000000001118

关键词

pilomatrixoma; epithelioma of Malherbe

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Pilomatrixoma, also known as calcifying epithelioma of Malherbe, is a superficial benign skin tumor that arises from hair follicle matrix cells. Although pilomatrixomas are well-recognized lesions, clinically they are frequently misdiagnosed as other skin conditions. By reviewing all the literature over the past 10 years, the aims of this article are to analyze the cause, clinical presentation, management, and outcome of pilomatrixoma among children and adults to gain a more complete understanding of this lesion in today's clinical context. Methods: A MEDLINE and EMBASE search was conducted from January 2005 to February 2015 using a combination of the terms: child, childhood, adult, and keywords: pilomatrixoma, pilomatricoma, and calcifying epithelioma of Malherbe. A total of 150 articles were reviewed. Results: The lesions occurred most commonly in the first and second decades (mean age 16 years and 7 months). The commonest presentation was of an asymptomatic, firm, slowly growing, mobile nodule. Only 16% were accurately diagnosed on clinical examination. Imaging in the form of ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging has been reported. Pathological diagnosis was achieved through incision, punch, and shave biopsies. Pathological findings are discussed and summarized in this review. Conclusion: Pilomatrixomas are thought to arise from mutation in the Wnt pathway and has been linked to several genetic conditions. It is commonly misdiagnosed preoperatively; however, with better awareness of the lesion, it can be appropriately treated while avoiding unnecessary diagnostic tests. Complete surgical excision with clear margins is almost always curative.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据