4.3 Article

EARLY ENTERAL NUTRITION AND OUTCOMES OF CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS TREATED WITH VASOPRESSORS AND MECHANICAL VENTILATION

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE
卷 19, 期 3, 页码 261-268

出版社

AMER ASSOC CRITICAL CARE NURSES
DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2010197

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To determine the effect of early enteral feeding on thethe outcome of critically ill medical patients whose hemodynamic condition is unstable. Methods Prospectively collected data in a multi-institutional medical intensive care unit database were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 1174 patients were identified who required mechanical ventilation for more than 2 days and were treated with vasopressor agents to support blood pressure. The patients were divided into 2 groups: those who received enteral nutrition (n = 707) within 48 hours of the start of mechanical ventilation, termed the early enteral nutrition group, and those who did not (n = 467), termed the late enteral nutrition group. The primary end points were overall intensive care unit and hospital mortality. Subgroup analyses were used to evaluate potential confounding variables. The data were also analyzed after adjustments for confounding by matching for propensity score. Results Intensive care unit and hospital mortality were lower in the early enteral nutrition group than in the late enteral group: 22.5% vs 28.3%; P = 03; and 34.0% vs 44.0%; P <.001, respectively. The beneficial effect of early feeding was more evident in the sickest patients, that is, those treated with multiple vasopressors (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.85) and those without early improvement (odds ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.90). When adjustments were made for confounding by matching for propensity score, early feeding was associated with decreased hospital mortality. Conclusion Early enteral nutrition may be associated with reduced intensive care unit and hospital mortality in patients whose hemodynamic condition is unstable. (American Journal of Critical Care. 2010;19:261-268)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据