4.3 Article

RELIABILITY OF INTRABLADDER PRESSURE MEASUREMENT IN INTENSIVE CARE

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE
卷 19, 期 4, 页码 E29-E40

出版社

AMER ASSOC CRITICAL CARE NURSES
DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2010204

关键词

-

资金

  1. Epsilon Phi Chapter, Sigma Theta Tau International
  2. Pennsylvania State Nurses Association
  3. AACN Phillips Medical Systems Outcome for Clinical Excellence research grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The reliability of intrabladder pressure measurements obtained in nonsupine patients is unknown. Objectives To investigate the reliability of measurements of intrabladder pressure obtained with 30 head-of-bed elevation. Methods With patients supine, 30 head-of-bed elevation, and instillation of 0 and 25 mL physiological saline, intrabladder pressure was measured in 10 patients: twice by one nurse to assess intraobserver reliability and once by a different nurse to assess interobserver reliability. Data were analyzed by using paired t tests, Pearson correlation, and Bland-Altman analysis. Results For intraobserver reliability, measurements obtained with no instillation (mean difference, -1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.9 to 1.3; P=.22) and with instillation of 25 mL (mean difference, -0.6; 95% CI, -1.8 to 0.6; P=.28) did not differ significantly. Pearson r values were 0.74 and 0.81, respectively. Estimated Bland-Altman bias and limits of agreements were -1.8 and -10.3 to 6.7 mm Hg and -0.6 and -3.82 to 2.62 mm Hg, respectively. For interobserver reliability, measurements obtained with no instillation (mean difference, 1.0; 95% CI, -2.2 to 4.2; P=.49) and with instillation of 25 mL (mean difference, -0.7; 95% CI, -2.45 to 1.05; P=.39) did not differ significantly. Pearson r values were 0.78 and 0.82, respectively. Estimated Bland-Altman bias and limits of agreement were 1.0 and -7.76 to 9.76 mm Hg and -0.7 and -5.5 to 4.0 mm Hg, respectively. Conclusions Reliability of intrabladder pressure measurements obtained with 30 head-of-bed elevation is strong. (American Journal of Critical Care. 2010; 19: e29-e40).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据