4.5 Article

Single-scattering properties of triaxial ellipsoidal particles for a size parameter range from the Rayleigh to geometric-optics regimes

期刊

APPLIED OPTICS
卷 48, 期 1, 页码 114-126

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/AO.48.000114

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [ATM-0803779]
  2. Office of Naval Research [N00014-02-0478, N00014-06-1-0069]
  3. Directorate For Geosciences
  4. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [0803779] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The single-scattering properties of randomly oriented triaxial ellipsoids with size parameters from the Rayleigh to geometric-optics regimes are investigated. A combination of the discrete dipole approximation (DDA) technique and an improved geometric optics method (IGOM) is applied to the computation of ellipsoidal particle scattering properties for a complete range of size parameters. Edge effect contributions to the extinction and absorption efficiencies are included in the present IGOM simulation. It is found that the extinction efficiency, single-scattering albedo, and asymmetry factor computed from the DDA method for small size parameters smoothly transition to those computed from the IGOM for moderate-to-large size parameters. The phase matrix elements computed from these two methods are also quite similar when size parameters are larger than 30. Thus, the optical properties of ellipsoidal particles can be computed by combing the DDA and the IGOM for small-to-large size parameters. Furthermore, we also examine the applicability of the ellipsoid model to the simulation of the scattering properties of realistic aerosol particles by comparing the theoretical and experimental results for feldspar aerosols. It is shown that the ellipsoid model is better than the commonly used spheroid model for simulating dust particle optical properties, particularly, their polarization characteristics, realistically. (C) 2008 Optical Society of America

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据