4.7 Article

Effect of breastfeeding compared with formula feeding on infant body composition: a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 95, 期 3, 页码 656-669

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.111.027284

关键词

-

资金

  1. Pfizer Nutrition
  2. Danone International
  3. Ferring Pharmaceuticals
  4. Action Medical Research [2008] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. National Institute for Health Research [ACF-2006-21-025] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Early-life nutrition may influence later body composition. The effect of breastfeeding and formula feeding on infant body composition is uncertain. Objective: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that examined body composition in healthy, term infants in relation to breastfeeding or formula feeding. Design: PubMed was searched for human studies that reported the outcomes fat-free mass, fat mass, or the percentage of fat mass in breastfed and formula-fed infants. Bibliographies were hand searched, and authors were contacted for additional data. The quality of studies was assessed. Differences in outcomes between feeding groups were compared at prespecified ages by using fixed-effects analyses except when heterogeneity indicated the use of random-effects analyses. Results: We identified 15 studies for inclusion in the systematic review and 11 studies for inclusion in the meta-analysis. In formula-fed infants, fat-free mass was higher at 3-4 mo [mean difference (95% CI): 0.13 kg (0.03, 0.23 kg)], 8-9 mo [0.29 kg (0.09, 0.49 kg)], and 12 mo [0.30 kg (0.13, 0.48 kg)], and fat mass was lower at 3-4 mo [-0.09 kg (-0.18, -0.01 kg)] and 6 mo [-0.18 kg (-0.34, -0.01 kg)] than in breastfed infants. Conversely, at 12 mo, fat mass was higher in formula-fed infants [0.29 kg (-0.03, 0.61 kg)] than in breastfed infants. Conclusion: Compared with breastfeeding, formula feeding is associated with altered body composition in infancy. Am J Clin Nutr 2012;95:656-69.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据