4.7 Article

Dietary macronutrient composition affects β cell responsiveness but not insulin sensitivity

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 94, 期 1, 页码 120-127

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.110.002162

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease [R01DK67538]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Altering dietary carbohydrate or fat content may have chronic effects on insulin secretion and sensitivity, which may vary with individual metabolic phenotype. Objective: The objective was to evaluate the contribution of tightly controlled diets differing in carbohydrate and fat content for 8 wk to insulin sensitivity and beta cell responsiveness and whether effects of diet would vary with race, free-living diet, or insulin response. Design: Healthy overweight men and women (36 European Americans, 33 African Americans) were provided with food for 8 wk and received either a eucaloric standard diet (55% carbohydrate, 27% fat) or a eucaloric reduced-carbohydrate (RedCHO)/higher-fat diet (43% carbohydrate, 39% fat). Insulin sensitivity and beta cell responsiveness were assessed at baseline and 8 wk by using a liquid meal tolerance test. Results: Insulin sensitivity did not change with diet (P = 0.1601). Static beta cell response to glucose (Phi S) was 28.5% lower after the RedCHO/higher-fat diet. Subgroup analyses indicated that lower Phi S with the RedCHO/higher-fat diet occurred primarily among African Americans. A significant inverse association was observed for change in glucose area under the curve compared with change in Phi S. Conclusions: Consumption of a eucaloric 43% carbohydrate/39% fat diet for 8 wk resulted in down-regulation of beta cell responsiveness, which was influenced by baseline phenotypic characteristics. Further study is needed to probe the potential cause-and-effect relation between change in Phi S and change in glucose tolerance. This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00726908. Am J Clin Nutr 2011;94:120-7.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据