4.7 Article

Fish consumption and risk of stroke in Swedish women

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 93, 期 3, 页码 487-493

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL NUTRITION
DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.110.002287

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research
  2. Swedish Research Council for Infrastructure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Epidemiologic studies of fish consumption in relation to risk of stroke have yielded inconsistent results. Objective: In this study, we examined the association between fish consumption and stroke incidence in women. Design: We analyzed data from a population-based prospective cohort of 34,670 women in the Swedish Mammography Cohort who were free of cardiovascular disease and cancer at baseline. Information on fish consumption was obtained by a self-administered questionnaire in 1997. Incident cases of stroke were ascertained from the Swedish Hospital Discharge Registry. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs. Results: Over a mean follow-up of 10.4 y, we ascertained 1680 incident cases of stroke, including 1310 cerebral infarctions, 233 hemorrhagic strokes, and 137 unspecified strokes. Fish consumption was significantly inversely associated with risk of total stroke but not with cerebral infarction or hemorrhagic stroke. Compared with women in the lowest quintile of fish consumption (< 1.0 serving of fish/wk), the multivariable RR of total stroke for women in the highest quintile (> 3.0 servings of fish/wk) was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.98; P for trend = 0.049). Consumption of lean fish but not of other fish types was inversely associated with risk of stroke. The multivariable RR of total stroke was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.49, 0.93; P for trend = 0.07) for >= 3 servings of lean fish/wk compared with that for no consumption. Conclusion: These results suggest that the consumption of fish, especially of lean fish, may reduce risk of stroke in women. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01127698. Am J Clin Nutr 2011;93:487-93.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据