4.7 Article

A qualitative study of fish consumption during pregnancy

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 92, 期 5, 页码 1234-1240

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.30070

关键词

-

资金

  1. HSPH NIEHS Center for Environmental Health [R01 ES016314, P01 ES000002]
  2. Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Many pregnant women in the United States do not consume enough docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)-an essential nutrient found in fish Apparently conflicting findings that fish consumption is beneficial for the developing fetus yet potentially toxic because of mercury contamination have created uncertainty about the appropriate fish consumption advice to provide to pregnant women Objective Our objective was to determine knowledge, behaviors, and received advice regarding fish consumption among pregnant women who are infrequent consumers of fish Design In 2009-2010 we conducted 5 focus groups with 22 pregnant women from the Boston area who ate <2 fish servings/wk We analyzed transcripts by using immersion crystallization Results Many women knew that fish might contain mercury a neurotoxin and had received advice to limit fish intake Fewer women knew that fish contains DHA or what the function of DHA is None of the women had received advice to eat fish, and most had not received information about which fish types contain more DHA or less mercury Because of advice to limit fish intake as well as a lack of information about which fish types they should be eating many of the women said that they would rather avoid fish than possibly harm themselves or their Infants The participants thought that a physician s advice to eat fish and a readily available reference regarding which fish are safe to consume during pregnancy would likely have encouraged them to eat more fish Conclusion Pregnant women might be willing to eat more fish if this were advised by their obstetricians or if they had an accessible reference regarding which types are safe Am J Clin Nutr 2010 92 1234-40

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据