4.5 Article

Rectal cancer with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, surgery, or watch and wait

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE
卷 31, 期 2, 页码 413-419

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-015-2460-y

关键词

Chemoradiotherapy; Rectal cancer; Complete clinical response; Watch and wait

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients treated with chemoradiotherapy with a complete clinical response followed by either a watch and wait strategy or a total mesorectal excision. This was an observational retrospective study from a single institute. Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following chemoradiotherapy with a complete clinical response from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2014 were included. The study population consisted of 18 patients who opted for a watch and wait policy and 26 patients who underwent radical surgery after achieving a complete clinical response. Patients had no documented treatment complications under the watch and wait policy, while 13 patients who underwent radical surgery experienced significant morbidity. There were two local recurrences in the watch and wait group; both were treated with salvage resection and had no associated mortality. In the radical surgery group, 1 patient showed an incomplete pathologic response (ypT0N1), and the remaining 25 patients showed complete pathologic responses; 1 had a distant recurrence, which was managed non-operatively, and 2 patients died of unrelated causes. The 5-year overall survival rate and median disease-free survival time were 100 % and 69.78 months in the watch and wait group and 92.30 % and 89.04 months in the radical surgery group. A watch and wait policy avoids the morbidity associated with radical surgery and preserves oncologic outcomes in our retrospective study from a single institute. It could be considered a therapeutic option in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following chemoradiotherapy with a complete clinical response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据