4.5 Article

Safety of supervised trainee-performed laparoscopic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE
卷 30, 期 5, 页码 639-644

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-015-2147-4

关键词

Inflammatory bowel disease; Laparoscopic colorectal surgery; Surgical training; Trainee-performed surgery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a significant risk of surgical resection during the lifetime of an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patient: laparoscopic surgery has been increasingly applied to the management of IBD with short and long-term advantages. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that laparoscopic surgery for IBD, performed by a surgical trainee under the supervision of an experienced trainer, is feasible and safe. All surgical procedures were sub-divided in six critical steps in order to define the procedure as supervised trainee performed (STP) when the trainer was present unscrubbed in the theatre or assisting and trainer performed (TNER) when the trainer performed two or more critical steps of the procedure. Included were all patients undergoing laparoscopic resection for IBD between January 2009 and December 2013. Thirty-day mortality and morbidity were the primary outcomes. Reoperations and rehospitalizations within 30 days of discharge were recorded prospectively and were the secondary outcomes together with conversion rate and length of hospital stay. One hundred fifty-one patients were included: 77 (50.99 %) STP and 74 (49.01 %) TNER. No deaths occurred, and 30-day morbidity was 27.15 % with no differences between the groups. Operating time was longer in the STP (166.6 +/- 53.31 vs 130.4 +/- 49.15). Five patients (2 vs 3) required reoperation (3.31 %), while 13 patients (8.6 %) required readmission. Laparoscopic surgery for IBD performed by a supervised trainee is safe compared to trainers performed procedures despite a longer operating time. Randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm these preliminary results and to investigate long-term outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据