4.7 Article

Ixeris dentata Decreases ER Stress and Hepatic Lipid Accumulation through Regulation of ApoB Secretion

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE
卷 42, 期 3, 页码 639-649

出版社

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0192415X14500414

关键词

Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; ER Stress; Hepatic Dyslipidemia; Ixeris dentata

资金

  1. Korea National Research Foundation [2012R1A2A1A03001907, 2008-0062279]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012R1A2A1A03001907] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is caused by the hepatic accumulation of saturated fatty acids involving the ER stress mechanism. Secretion of apo lipid carrier proteins and their binding to hepatic TG and cholesterol are affected by ER stress. This study was designed to identify ER stress regulators with potential effects against hepatic lipid accumulation. Ixeris dentata (IXD) is a traditional herbal remedy for indigestion, hepatitis, and diabetes used in Korea, Japan, and China. To examine the regulatory effects of IXD against hepatic lipid accumulation and elucidate its suggested mechanism of ER stress, HepG2 hepatocytes were treated with IXD extract in the presence of palmitate. While palmitate induced an ER stress response in hepatocytes, as indicated by the upregulation of PERK, increased eukaryotic initiation factor 2 alpha (eIF2 alpha) phosphorylation, enhanced expression of GADD153/C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP), and reduced secretion of apoB resulting in hepatic cellular accumulation of triglycerides (TG) and cholesterol, IXD extract significantly inhibited the lipid accumulation and PERK/eIF2 alpha/CHOP-axis of the ER stress response. The inhibition of the PERK/eIF2 alpha/CHOP signaling pathway by IXD in palmitate-treated cells suggests that IXD regulates hepatic dyslipidemia through the regulation of ER stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据