4.2 Article

Effect of Activated Charcoal on Apixaban Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Subjects

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 147-154

出版社

ADIS INT LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s40256-013-0055-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMS)
  2. Pfizer Inc.
  3. Pfizer
  4. BMS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Activated charcoal is commonly used to manage overdose or accidental ingestion of medicines. This study evaluated the effect of activated charcoal on apixaban exposure in human subjects. This was an open-label, three-treatment, three-period, randomized, crossover study of single-dose apixaban (20 mg) administered alone and with activated charcoal given at 2 or 6 h post-dose to healthy subjects. Blood samples for assay of plasma apixaban concentration were collected up to 72 h post-dose. Pharmacokinetic parameters, including peak plasma concentration (C (max)), time to C (max) (T (max)), area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC(INF)), and terminal half-life (T (A1/2)), were derived from apixaban plasma concentration-time data. A general linear mixed-effect model analysis of C (max) and AUC(INF) was performed to estimate the effect of activated charcoal on apixaban exposure. A total of 18 subjects were treated and completed the study. AUC(INF) for apixaban without activated charcoal decreased by 50 and 28 %, respectively, when charcoal was administered at 2 and 6 h post-dose. Apixaban C (max) and T (max) were similar across treatments. The mean T (A1/2) for apixaban alone (13.4 h) decreased to similar to 5 h when activated charcoal was administered at 2 or 6 h post-dose. Overall, apixaban was well tolerated in this healthy population, and most adverse events were consistent with the known profile of activated charcoal. Administration of activated charcoal up to 6 h after apixaban reduced apixaban exposure and facilitated the elimination of apixaban. These results suggest that activated charcoal may be useful in the management of apixaban overdose or accidental ingestion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据