4.4 Review

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in African American children: What can be concluded from the past ten years?

期刊

CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 77-86

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.10.001

关键词

ADHD; African American; Prevalence; Inattention; Hyperactivity

资金

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH059105, R01-2MH59105] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Samuel et al. [Samuel, V. J., Curtis, S., Thornell, A., George, R, Taylor, A., Brome, D. R., et al. (1997). The unexplored void of ADHD and African-American research: A review of the literature. Journal of Attention Disorders, 1(4), 197-207.] reviewed the literature Oil Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in African Americans, and found a paucity of research. The present review of 73 articles updates this assessment of available research and presents the Current understanding of ADHD symptoms, assessment, diagnosis, and treatment in African American children ages 3-18. The authors conducted a qualitative review, as well as a mini meta-analysis of 5 studies of ADHD symptoms and 5 studies of ADHD diagnosis to clarify the question of racial differences in prevalence. African American Youth had more ADHD symptoms (Cohen's d=0.45. p<.001). yet were diagnosed with ADHD only two-thirds as often as Caucasian Youth (OR=.66, p<.001). This pattern was not explained by teacher rating bias or by SES, but may be influenced by Parent beliefs about ADHD, higher rates of risk, and lack of treatment access and utilization. Lower treatment rates may be related to high rates of classroom behavior problems among African American Youth. Findings also Suggest that existing assessment tools may not adequately capture ADHD manifestation in African Americans. Findings highlight the need for more investigation and awareness of relevant Cultural issues to inform a culturally competent approach to assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of ADHD in African Americans. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据