4.5 Article

THE RESPONSE OF ASTER AMELLUS (ASTERACEAE) TO MYCORRHIZA DEPENDS ON THE ORIGINS OF BOTH THE SOIL AND THE FUNGI

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
卷 98, 期 5, 页码 850-858

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.0900350

关键词

arbuscular mycorrhiza; Aster amellus; Asteraceae; dry grasslands; Glomus mosseae; inoculation; local adaptation; native fungi; specificity

资金

  1. MSMT [0021620828, 206/08/H049]
  2. [IAA600050705]
  3. [P504/10/1486]
  4. [AV0Z60050516]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

. Premise of study: Previous studies testing pairwise interactions between plants, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and soil have shown that the effectiveness of such interactions depends on the origins of the plants, soil, and AMF. Surprisingly, no study has yet looked at the three-way interaction between plants, soil, and AMF originating from the same and from different sites. Such knowledge could elucidate the determinants of local adaptations of plants and thus might help in various revegetation attempts. . Methods: Six populations of the obligately mycorrhizal plant species Aster amellus from two isolated regions were combined with the soil and the AMF ecotype from their sites and plant growth were monitored over 16 months. . Key results: For each combination of soil and native AMF, plants grown with their native AMF in their native soil had higher aboveground biomass, invested more to aboveground biomass and had higher numbers of flower heads than the other plants. The specificity of the relationship among plant populations, AMF, and soil was also observed for percentage of root colonization. . Conclusions: The study extends our knowledge of the specific interaction between plants and AMF by demonstrating that the positive effect of native AMF occurs only when the plants are also grown in their native soil. Thus, when attempting to facilitate plant growth, we need to consider the origin of the plants, the soil, and the AMF, because all three components are adapted to each other.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据