4.5 Article

LYTHRUM AND PEPLIS FROM THE LATE CRETACEOUS AND CENOZOIC OF NORTH AMERICA AND EURASIA: NEW EVIDENCE SUGGESTING EARLY DIVERSIFICATION WITHIN THE LYTHRACEAE

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
卷 98, 期 11, 页码 1801-1815

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1100204

关键词

biogeography; Cenozoic; Cretaceous; evolution; fossils; Lythraceae; Lythrum; Peplis; pollen; speciation

资金

  1. FWF (Austrian Science Fund) [M 1181-B17]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Premise of the study : To fully understand the evolution of today's angiosperms, the fossil record of plant families and genera must be used to determine their time of origin and phytogeographic history. As within many angiosperm families, the interrelationships of extant Lythraceae are hard to resolve without sufficient data from the geological past. Here we establish the earliest fossil occurrences of Lythraceae and start resolving the interrelationships and evolution of two of its genera, Lythrum and Peplis. Methods : We studied several Cretaceous and Cenozoic palynofloras from the northern and southern hemispheres. Using the single-grain technique, we screened the treated samples for Lythrum- and Peplis-type pollen. The same individual pollen grains were observed under both the light-and scanning electron microscope, allowing a high taxonomic resolution to be achieved. Key results : Fossil Lythraceae pollen grains are rare in palynological samples. Nevertheless, we were able to identify Lythrum and Peplis pollen from Late Cretaceous sediments and thereby extend the fossil record of the two genera by ca 70 million years. Conclusions : The appearance of Lythrum and Peplis in North America and Peplis in Asia at approximately the same interval in the mid Late Cretaceous points to an already wide geographical distribution by then. These findings add vital information for the time of origin of the Lythraceae and suggest a higher diversity within the family. They also indicate that the distribution of particular genera during the Cretaceous was wider than previously thought.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据