4.5 Article

POLLINATION CONTEXT EFFECTS IN THE HIGH-MOUNTAIN DIMORPHIC ARMERIA CAESPITOSA (PLUMBAGINACEAE): NEIGHBORHOOD IS SOMETHING MORE THAN DENSITY

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
卷 96, 期 9, 页码 1620-1626

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.0800374

关键词

Armeria caespitosa; density dependence; frequency dependence; Mediterranean mountains; narrow endemism; plant reproduction; Plumbaginaceae; self-incompatible system

资金

  1. Spanish Government [2006-0943 I/BOS, S-0505/AMB-0335]
  2. Madrid's Government predoctoral fellowship [3334/04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Frequency-dependent processes are relevant for flowering, plant reproduction, especially for species with disassortative mating. In an individual-based study, we tested not only the effects of local density on reproductive Success at small spatial scales, but also those of neighborhood quality. To test the neighborhood effects on the reproduction of Armeria caespitosa, a dimorphic Mediterranean high-mountain endemic, we introduce a novel pollination context (PC) index that considered the distance, floral display, and floral morph of neighbors at small scales (within 2 in from the focal plant), studying rock and pasture populations at both edges of the species altitudinal distribution. Reproductive Success depended significantly on PC only at the low populations, suggesting that the PC effects are population-dependent and Supporting the hypothesis that the neighborhood quality influences the reproductive success of A. caespitosa at least in stressful conditions. Moreover, fruit set was morph-dependent in the high-pasture population. The specific role of the spatial structure of compatible vs. incompatible morphs at small scales of the dimorphic self-incompatibility system in Armeria deserves further attention. Parameters other than plant density are useful for the study of small-scale density-dependent processes that affect pollination and other reproductive components, especially if they integrate neighborhood quality information at adequate spatial scales.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据