4.5 Review

Phylogenetic relationships of aroids and duckweeds (Araceae) inferred from coding and noncoding plastid DNA

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
卷 95, 期 9, 页码 1153-1165

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.0800073

关键词

Araceae; Lemnaceae; molecular phylogenetics; plastid DNA; rbcL; subfamilial and tribal classification; trnK-matK; trnL-trnF

资金

  1. Posgrado en Ciencias Biologicas, UNAM
  2. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT) [133137]
  3. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Familial. subfamilial and tribal monophyly and relationships of aroids and duckweeds were assessed by parsimony and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses of five regions of coding (rbcL, matL) and noncoding plastid DNA (partial trnK intron, trnL intron, trnL-trnF spacer) for exemplars of nearly all aroid and duckweed genera. Our analyses confirm the position of Lemna and its allies (formerly Lemnaceae) within Araceae as the well-supported sister group of all aroids except Gymnostachydoideae and Orontioideae. The last two subfamilies form the sister clade of the rest of the family. Monophyly of subfamilies Orontioideae, Pothoideae. Monsteroideae, and Lasioideae is supported, but Aroideae are paraphyletic if Calla is maintained in its own subfamily (Calloideae). Our results suggest expansion of the recently proposed subfamily Zamioculcadoideae (Zamioculcas, Gonatopus) to include Stylochaeton and identify problems in the current delimitation of tribes Anadendreae, Heteropsideae, and Monstereae (Monsteroideae), Caladieae/Zomicarpeae, and Colocasicae (Aroideae). Canalization of traits of the spathe and spadix considered typical of Araceae evolved after the split of Gymnostachydoideae, Orontioideae, and Leninoideae. An association with aquatic habitats is a plesiomorphic attribute in Araceae, occurring in the helophytic Orontioideae and free-floating Lemnoideae, but evolving independently in various derived aroid lineages including free-floating Pistia (Aroideae).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据