4.5 Article

Suboptimal risk factor control in patients undergoing elective coronary or peripheral percutaneous intervention

期刊

AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL
卷 168, 期 3, 页码 310-U102

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.05.011

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Heart and Lung Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health [HL114978]
  2. American Heart Association Clinical Research Program [13CRP14410042]
  3. Doris Duke Charitable Foundation [2010055]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The American Heart Association recommends targeting 7 cardiovascular (CV) health metrics to reduce morbidity and mortality. Control of these targets in patients undergoing CV intervention is uncertain. Methods We prospectively studied patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary or peripheral intervention from November 2010 to May 2012. We recorded data on patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and social history. Risk factor control was categorized as ideal, intermediate, or poor according to the 7 American Heart Association-defined CV health metrics (smoking status, body mass index, physical activity, diet, cholesterol, blood pressure, and metabolic control). Linear regression model was used to evaluate the association between baseline characteristics and poor CV health. Results Among 830 consecutive patients enrolled, mean age is 67.3 +/- 10.8 years, 74.2% are male, and 62.1% are white. The adequacy of achievement of ideal CV health is suboptimal in our cohort; the mean number of ideal CV metrics is 2.15 +/- 1.06. Less than 1 in 10 (9.7%) met >= 4 ideal CV health metrics. After multivariate analysis, male sex (P = .04), nonwhite race (P = .01), prior coronary artery disease (P < .01), prior peripheral arterial disease (P < .01), and history of depression (P = .01) were significantly associated with poor CV health. Conclusions Among patients referred for elective CV intervention, achievement of ideal CV health is poor. Elective interventions represent an opportunity to identify and target CV health for risk factor control and secondary prevention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据