4.5 Article

Novel biomarkers in cardiovascular disease: Update 2010

期刊

AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL
卷 160, 期 4, 页码 583-594

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.06.010

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Heart Foundation
  2. Accumetrics
  3. Astra-Zeneca
  4. Bayer Healthcare
  5. Beckman Coulter
  6. Biosite
  7. BRAHMS
  8. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  9. CV Therapeutics
  10. Daichii Sankyo Ltd
  11. Eli Lilly and Co
  12. GlaxoSmithKline
  13. Merck and Company
  14. Nanosphere
  15. Novartis Pharmaceuticals
  16. OrthoClinical Diagnostics
  17. Pfizer
  18. Roche Diagnostics
  19. Sanofi-Aventis
  20. Sanofi-Synthelabo
  21. Schering-Plough
  22. Siemens
  23. Singulex

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rapid evaluation of patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of an acute coronary syndrome is of great clinical relevance. Biomarkers have become increasingly important in this setting to supplement electrocardiographic findings and patient history because one or both can be misleading. Today, cardiac troponin is still the only marker used routinely in this setting due to its myocardial tissue specificity and sensitivity, as well as its established usefulness for therapeutic decision making. However, even current generation troponin assays have certain limitations such as insufficient sensitivity for diagnosing unstable angina. Novel high-sensitivity assays for cardiac troponin have the potential to overcome these limitations. Further studies are needed to answer some critical questions regarding the best cutoffs for diagnosis and risk assessment and the optimal work-up for rule-out of acute myocardial infarction. Other nonmyocardial tissue-specific markers might help in this setting. Myeloperoxidase, copeptin, and growth differentiation factor 15 reflect different aspects of the development of atherosclerosis or acute ischemia. Each has demonstrated impact in risk stratification of acute coronary syndromes. Limited data also show that copeptin may, when used together with cardiac troponin, improve the sensitivity for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction, and growth differentiation factor 15 may help in selection of patients that benefit from invasive therapy. Further evaluation is needed before these markers can be adopted routinely in clinical practice. (Am Heart J 2010; 160: 583-94.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据