4.5 Article

Interleukin-6 and atrial fibrillation in patients with coronary artery disease: Data from the Heart and Soul Study

期刊

AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL
卷 155, 期 2, 页码 303-309

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.09.006

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [KL2 RR024130-02, K12 RR024130, KL2 RR024130] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [L30 HL078035-01, R01 HL079235, R01 HL072854, R01-HL072854, L30 HL078035, L30 HL078035-02] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Previous studies suggest that markers of inflammation are elevated in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, because inflammation has been implicated in contributing to risk of both AF and coronary artery disease (CAD), which are often present in the same populations, it is important to control for confounding by the presence of CAD. We therefore examined several biomarkers of inflammation and ultimately genotyped IL-6 polymorphisms in patients with AF in a cohort of subjects with known CAD. Methods We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 971 participants in the Heart and Soul Study, 46 of whom had AF. Interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor-a, CD-40 ligand, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, and fibrinogen levels were measured. Results In both unadjusted and adjusted analyses, IL-6 was the only biomarker significantly associated with AF (median IL-6 3.76 and 2.52 pg/mL in those with and without AF, respectively, P =.0005; adjusted odds ratio 1.77, P =.032). The IL-6-174CC genotype was significantly associated with the presence of AF in the adjusted analysis (odds ratio 2.34, P =.04) and with higher IL-6 levels (P =.002). Conclusions In this cohort of subjects with CAD, AF was significantly associated with elevated IL-6 levels and the IL-6-174CC genotype. No associations were found with other biomarkers, including C-reactive protein. This suggests that IL-6 is a uniquely important mediator in the pathophysiology of AF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据