4.6 Article

Biomarker-assist score for reverse remodeling prediction in heart failure: The ST2-R2 score

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 184, 期 -, 页码 337-343

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.02.019

关键词

Heart failure; Reverse remodeling; LVEF; Biomarkers; ST2

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Limited data exists regarding biomarker use to predict left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling (R2). Our aim was to examine the value of soluble ST2 (ST2), N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), and galectin-3 relative to LV-R2 in systolic heart failure (HF), and to develop a clinical score for LV-R2 prediction. Methods: R2 was defined as a) LV ejection fraction (LVEF) increase >= 15%, or b) LVEF increase >= 10% plus reduction of LV end-systolic diameter index >= 20% or LV end-systolic volume >= 40%, for 12 months. Results: We studied 304 patients (79.6% men, mean age 66.1 +/- 12.3 years) with baseline LVEF <40%. R2 was observed in 104 patients (34.2%). In univariable logistic regression, factors associatedwith R2 were age (p = 0.02), non-ischemic etiology of HF (p < 0.001), NYHA functional class (p = 0.02), baseline LVEF (p = 0.005), absence of left bundle branch block (LBBB; p = 0.002), ST2 (p = 0.004), NT-proBNP (p = 0.005), and hs-cTnT (p < 0.001); HF duration achieved borderline significance (p = 0.08). In multivariable analysis, ST2 remained the only biomarker associated with LV-R2. We developed the ST2-R2 score for use in clinical practice for predicting R2; variables included were ST2 <48 ng/mL, non-ischemic etiology, absence of LBBB, HF duration <12 months, baseline LVEF <24%, and beta-blocker treatment. The score had an area under the curve of 0.79 in the derivation cohort and 0.73 in a separate validation cohort. Conclusions: The ST2-R2 score, which includes the novel biomarker ST2 and five clinical variables, reasonably predicts LV-R2 in systolic HF patients. ST2 was the only studied biomarker that was independently associated with R2. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据