4.6 Article

Mining, land restoration and sustainable development in isolated islands: An industrial ecology perspective on extractive transitions on Nauru

期刊

AMBIO
卷 48, 期 4, 页码 397-408

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13280-018-1075-2

关键词

Industrial ecology; Mining; Nauru; Phosphates; Rehabilitation; Sustainable development

资金

  1. Pavetta Foundation in Brisbane, Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this empirically grounded perspective, we explore how, if managed correctly, mining might go beyond a straight conversion of finite natural capital to financial resources. We suggest a process where mineral extraction could act as a catalyst for more diversified growth and even serve as a basis to restore forms of natural capital' it had previously diminished. The case in pointsmall in scale but significant in consequenceis the particularly challenging instance of the small-island state of Nauru, which has a very negative history of socio-ecological impacts of phosphate mining. Yet, the degraded landscape requires capital investment which could be reaped from restoration of the land using revenues generated from exporting the waste rock pinnacles as branded household counter-tops and pavement stone products with an island provenance premium. Furthermore, we use an industrial ecology method to show that Nauru's secondary phosphate can be shown to be less environmentally impactful than comparable phosphate from other sources. This has potential for further green branding of the Island's products. We contend that implementing such a restoration approach that harnesses the remaining mineral capital with care has the potential, to diversify the island's economy from one dependent on extractive industries and donors to agroforestry, fishing and tourism. A holistic approach is offered that considers prudent use of Nauru's remaining mineral resources towards an agenda of ecological restoration and economic diversification that will allow the island to prosper after the phosphates it has traditionally relied upon are depleted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据