4.7 Article

National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association guidelines for the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer's disease

期刊

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 1-13

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.10.007

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Lewy body disease; Vascular brain injury; Neuropathology; Consensus guidelines

资金

  1. NIH [AG05134, AG05136, AG03991, AG05681, AG24904, AG28383, AG10161, AG17917, AG10124, AG13854, AG19610, NS62684, AG16570, AG15819, AG12435, AG05131, AG016976, AG18840]
  2. AA, Arizona Department of Health Services (Arizona Alzheimer's Consortium) [211002]
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [TH-624-4-1]
  4. Alzheimer Forschung Initiative (AFT) [10810]
  5. Nancy and Buster Alvord Endowment
  6. Charles and Joanne Knight Alzheimer Research Initiative
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [P50NS062684] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [P50AG005681, U19AG010483, R01AG018440, P50AG005134, U19AG024904, R37AG018440, P50AG005136, U01AG024904, P01AG003949, U01AG016976, P50AG016570, RF1AG015819, P30AG028383, P50AG005131, P01AG012435, R01AG015819, P30AG019610, R01AG042210, P30AG013854, P30AG010161, P01AG003991, R01AG017917, P30AG010124] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A consensus panel from the United States and Europe was convened recently to update and revise the 1997 consensus guidelines for the neuropathologic evaluation of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other diseases of brain that are common in the elderly. The new guidelines recognize the pre-clinical stage of AD, enhance the assessment of AD to include amyloid accumulation as well as neurofibrillary change and neuritic plaques, establish protocols for the neuropathologic assessment of Lewy body disease, vascular brain injury, hippocampal sclerosis, and TDP-43 inclusions, and recommend standard approaches for the workup of cases and their clinico-pathologic correlation. (C) 2012 The Alzheimer's Association. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据