4.1 Article

Improving Physician Awareness of Alzheimer Disease and Enhancing Recruitment: The Clinician Partners Program

期刊

ALZHEIMER DISEASE & ASSOCIATED DISORDERS
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 61-67

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e318212c0df

关键词

Alzheimer disease; physician education; research recruitment; dementia

资金

  1. National Institute on Aging at the National Institutes of Health [P01 AG03991, P01 AG026276, P50 AG05681]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Primary care providers routinely evaluate older adults and are thus in a position to first detect symptoms and signs of Alzheimer disease. In urban areas, diagnostic or management difficulties may be referred to specialists; however, in rural areas, specialists may not be available. The Clinician Partners Program (CPP) was initiated to enhance rural health providers' ability in the diagnosis of dementia and care, and to increase research recruitment into dementia research studies of participants from rural communities. Methods: The CPP is a 3-day miniresidency of didactic, observational, and skill-based teaching techniques. Participants completed pretests and posttests evaluating dementia knowledge, confidence in providing care, and practice behaviors. Results: Between 2000 and 2009, 146 health care professionals with a mean age of 45.7 +/- 10.8 years attended the CPP; 79.2% were white, 58.2% were women, and 58% of participants had been in practice for more than 10 years. Posttests showed an improvement in knowledge and confidence for diagnosis and treatment and increased the use of dementia screening tools. Rural research participation in an urban Alzheimer Disease Research Center increased 52% over the pre-CPP period. Conclusions: The following primary goals were accomplished: increased knowledge and confidence, changed practice habits, and enhanced research recruitment. Educational programs such as the CPP may be beneficial for increasing access to accurate diagnoses and appropriate treatment for Alzheimer disease while also enhancing research participation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据