4.2 Article

Safety and efficacy of once-daily treatment with beclomethasone dipropionate nasal aerosol in subjects with perennial allergic rhinitis

期刊

ALLERGY AND ASTHMA PROCEEDINGS
卷 33, 期 3, 页码 249-257

出版社

OCEAN SIDE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.2500/aap.2012.33.3571

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R D, Inc.
  2. Alcon
  3. Amgen
  4. Apotex
  5. AstraZeneca
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim
  7. Cephalon
  8. Electrocore
  9. GlaxoSmithKline
  10. HRA
  11. MedImmune
  12. Novartis
  13. Proctor Gamble
  14. Schering-Plough
  15. Sunovion
  16. Teva

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intranasal corticosteroids are recommended as first-line therapy for the treatment of the symptoms of persistent allergic rhinitis (AR). Since the phase-out of chlorofluorocarbon nasal aerosols, intranasal corticosteroids have been available only as aqueous nasal sprays. This study was designed to assess the efficacy, safety, and quality-of-life benefits of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) hydrofluoroalkane nasal aerosol in subjects with perennial AR (PAR). After a 7- to 21-day placebo run-in period, eligible subjects aged >= 12 years with PAR were randomized to 6 weeks of once-daily treatment with BDP nasal aerosol at 320 mu g or placebo. Reflective and instantaneous total nasal symptom scores (rTNSS and iTNSS, respectively), Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) score, and physician-assessed total nasal symptom score were evaluated. The primary end point was change from baseline in average morning (A.M.) and evening (P.M.) subject-reported rTNSS over the 6-week treatment period. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. Treatment with BDP nasal aerosol showed significantly greater improvement in average A.M. and P.M. rTNSS compared with placebo (mean treatment difference, -0.84; 95% confidence interval, -1.2, -0.5; p < 0.001). Greater improvements in rTNSS were reported as early as day 1 and were maintained throughout the 6-week treatment period with the exception of day 2. Greater improvements were seen for all four individual nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, nasal itching, rhinorrhea, and sneezing) with BDP nasal aerosol compared with placebo. Similarly, significant improvements were seen in average A.M. and P.M. iTNSS (p < 0.001) and RQLQ score (p = 0.001) with BDP nasal aerosol compared with placebo. In addition, BDP nasal aerosol treatment was well tolerated, and its safety profile was comparable to that of placebo. This clinical study indicated that treatment with BDP nasal aerosol provides statistically significant and clinically meaningful nasal symptom relief accompanied by improved quality of life in subjects with PAR. Additionally, treatment with BDP nasal aerosol was well tolerated with a safety profile comparable to that of placebo. This study was part of the clinical trial NCT01134705 registered in www.ClinicalTrials.gov. (Allergy Asthma Proc 33:249-257, 2012; doi: 10.2500/aap.2012.33.3571)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据