4.6 Article

Aberrant dendritic cell function conditions Th2-cell polarization in allergic rhinitis

期刊

ALLERGY
卷 68, 期 3, 页码 312-321

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/all.12090

关键词

allergens; dendritic cells; IL-10; IL-12; Th2 cytokines

资金

  1. Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique, Belgium [FRSM 3.4565.06, 3.4522.12]
  2. Academic Drug Discovery Initiative (ADDI)
  3. ADDI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Myeloid (m) and plasmacytoid (p) dendritic cells (DCs) regulate immune responses to allergens, whereas it remains unclear whether abnormal DC function characterizes patients with airway allergy and whether putative dysfunction exists only in target organs. To evaluate DC function from patients with allergic rhinitis (AR), we assessed nasal, cutaneous as well as blood DCs after in vivo and in vitro allergen challenge, respectively. Methods DCs were immunostained in nasal and skin tissues, and cytokine expression was assessed by dual immunofluorescence. Cytokine production and regulation of cocultured peripheral CD4+ T cells were assayed by ELISA. Results In AR patients, local allergen challenge resulted in increases in pDC and mDC numbers at 8h in the nasal mucosa and at 848h in the skin. Defects in IL-10 and IFN- were observed in both organs from AR. Blood mDCs from AR exhibited reduced IL-10 and IL-12 expression. The capacity of activated pDCs from AR to produce IFN- and to trigger IL-10 by allogeneic CD4+ T cells was diminished, whereas mDCs from these patients supported Th2- and Th17-cell differentiation. Conclusion In allergic rhinitis, DCs are altered not only locally but also in the systemic circulation. mDCs and pDCs increased in airway and skin tissues exposed to the allergen and displayed reduced production of IL-10 and type 1 signals' (IL-12, IFN-) both locally and in blood. Functional studies showed that this results in preferential Th2/Th17-cell polarization and impaired generation by blood DCs of IL-10+ T cells, linking systemic DC dysfunction and biased T-cell responses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据