4.6 Article

Low-dose aspirin desensitization in individuals with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease

期刊

ALLERGY
卷 68, 期 5, 页码 659-665

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/all.12131

关键词

aspirin desensitization; aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease; chronic rhinosinusitis; maintenance dose; nasal polyp relapse

资金

  1. University of Mainz, Germany (MAIFOR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Nasal polyposis frequently occurs within the clinical picture of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD). A derailed arachidonic acid metabolism is regarded to be part of the pathophysiology of AERD, and aspirin desensitization is the only causal therapeutic option, so far. The optimal maintenance dose of aspirin desensitization to prevent nasal polyp recurrence on the one hand and to minimize aspirin-related side-effects, on the other hand, is still a matter of debate. The aim of this trial was to investigate the efficacy and safety of a low-dose aspirin desensitization protocol. Methods After sinus surgery, 70 individuals with AERD were randomly allocated to a prospective double-blind placebo-controlled aspirin desensitization protocol with a maintenance dose of 100mg daily. The primary outcome was polyp relapse after 36months. Nasal endoscopy status, quality of life, and patients' symptom score as well as aspirin-related side-effects were monitored. Results Due to the high dropout rate, only 31 individuals were evaluated. After 36months, nasal polyp relapse was less frequent (P=0.0785) and the polyposis score was lower (P=0.0702) in the therapy group. Quality of life obviously improved (P=0.0324), clinical complaints (P=0.0083) were significantly reduced, and no severe aspirin-related side-effects were observed. Conclusion Aspirin desensitization with a maintenance dose of 100mg daily has a positive impact on nasal polyp relapse and seems to be a safe and suitable therapy to improve clinical complaints and the quality of life of individuals with AERD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据