4.6 Article

Anti-IL-33 antibody has a therapeutic effect in a murine model of allergic rhinitis

期刊

ALLERGY
卷 67, 期 2, 页码 183-190

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02735.x

关键词

allergic rhinitis; allergy; atopy; interleukin-33

资金

  1. Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [A110012]
  2. Inha University
  3. Ministry of Environment, Republic of Korea
  4. Korea Health Promotion Institute [A110012] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Interleukin (IL)-33 is involved in the Th2 immune response and could play an essential role in nasal allergy. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the therapeutic potential of anti-IL-33 for allergic rhinitis (AR). Methods: Twenty-four BALB/c mice were used. In group A (control group, n = 6), mice were sensitized and challenged with saline. Group B [ovalbumin (OVA) group, n = 6] mice received intraperitoneal and intranasal OVA challenge. In group C (control IgG group, n = 6), mice were injected intraperitoneally with rabbit control IgG before OVA challenge. In group D (anti-IL-33 group, n = 6), anti-IL-33 was injected before challenge. We evaluated the number of nose-scratching events and external morphology; serum total and OVA-specific IgE; number of eosinophils, neutrophils, and lymphocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid; histopathologic examination of nasal cavity; and IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 in BAL fluid. Results: Anti-IL-33 treatment significantly reduced the nose-scratching events and ameliorated skin denudation. Serum total and OVA-specific IgE was significantly decreased in group D. The number of eosinophils in BAL fluid was also significantly decreased. Eosinophilic infiltration in the nasal cavity was significantly decreased in group D. IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 in BAL fluid were also significantly decreased after treatment. Conclusions: Anti-IL-33 antibody has a therapeutic potential for experimental AR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据