4.7 Review

Heat shock proteins in hepatocellular carcinoma: Molecular mechanism and therapeutic potential

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 138, 期 8, 页码 1824-1834

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29723

关键词

heat shock proteins; hepatocellular carcinoma; therapeutic resistance; metastasis

类别

资金

  1. National Key Sci-Tech Special Project of China [2012ZX10002011-004]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81301818, 81402278]
  3. Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine [YG2014MS44, BXJ201319]
  4. Renji Hospital [RJZZ12-008]
  5. State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes [SB14-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are highly conserved proteins, which are expressed at low levels under normal conditions, but significantly induced in response to cellular stresses. As molecular chaperones, HSPs play crucial roles in protein homeostasis, apoptosis, invasion and cellular signaling transduction. The induction of HSPs is an important part of heat shock response, which could help cancer cells to adapt to stress conditions. Because of the constant stress condition in tumor microenvironment, HSPs overexpression is widely reported in many human cancers. In light of the significance of HSPs for cancer cells to survive and obtain invasive phenotype under stress condition, HSPs are often associated with poor prognosis and treatment resistance in many types of human cancers. It has been described that upregulation of HSPs may serve as diagnostic and prognostic markers in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Targeting HSPs with specific inhibitor alone or in combination with chemotherapy regimens holds promise for the improvement of outcomes for HCC patients. In this review, we summarize the expression profiles, functions and molecular mechanisms of HSPs (HSP27, HSP70 and HSP90) as well as a HSP-like protein (clusterin) in HCC. In addition, we address progression and challenges in targeting these HSPs as novel therapeutic strategies in HCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据