4.7 Review

Systematic review with meta-analysis: the effects of rifaximin in hepatic encephalopathy

期刊

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
卷 40, 期 2, 页码 123-132

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apt.12803

关键词

-

资金

  1. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  2. Lundbeck Foundation
  3. Norgine
  4. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF13OC0006561, NNF11OC1015075, NNF13OC0006329, NNF11OC1014467] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Rifaximin is recommended for prevention of hepatic encephalopathy (HE). The effects of rifaximin on overt and minimal HE are debated. Aim To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on rifaximin for HE. Methods We performed electronic and manual searches, gathered information from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Home Page, and obtained unpublished information on trial design and outcome measures from authors and pharmaceutical companies. Meta-analyses were performed and results presented as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and the number needed to treat. Subgroup, sensitivity, regression and sequential analyses were performed to evaluate the risk of bias and sources of heterogeneity. Results We included 19 RCTs with 1370 patients. Outcomes were recalculated based on unpublished information of 11 trials. Overall, rifaximin had a beneficial effect on secondary prevention of HE (RR: 1.32; 95% CI 1.06-1.65), but not in a sensitivity analysis on rifaximin after TIPSS (RR: 1.27; 95% CI 1.00-1.53). Rifaximin increased the proportion of patients who recovered from HE (RR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.46-0.76) and reduced mortality (RR: 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.97). The results were robust to adjustments for bias control. No small study effects were identified. The sequential analyses only confirmed the results of the analysis on HE recovery. Conclusions Rifaximin has a beneficial effect on hepatic encephalopathy and may reduce mortality. The combined evidence suggests that rifaximin may be considered in the evidence-based management of hepatic encephalopathy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据