4.7 Review

Systematic review with meta-analysis: post-infectious functional dyspepsia

期刊

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
卷 41, 期 2, 页码 177-188

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apt.13006

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science
  2. Ministry of Health, Japan
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24590928] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundThe prevalence of functional dyspepsia (FD) following infectious gastroenteritis has not been systematically reviewed. AimTo conduct a systematic review and calculate the summary odds ratio (OR) for the development of FD following infectious gastroenteritis, as compared to a control population. MethodsPublished studies in PubMed, EmBASE, and Cochrane Database and abstracts from standard sources were screened for eligible studies. Data from studies meeting inclusion criteria were pooled for meta-analysis. ResultsNineteen studies were eligible for inclusion. The mean prevalence of FD following acute gastroenteritis (AGE) was 9.55% (FD, n=909; AGE, n=9517) in adult populations. The summary OR for the development of post-infectious FD was 2.54 (95% CI=1.76-3.65) at more than 6months after AGE, as compared to the prevalence in controls within the same population. This is compared with the summary OR (3.51; 95% CI=2.05-6.00) for the development of post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in the same population at more than 6months after AGE. There was significant statistical heterogeneity with an I-2 of 72.8% for the summary OR of post-infectious FD. Several pathogens, including Salmonella spp., Escherichia coli O157, Campylobacter jejuni, Giardia lamblia and Norovirus have been shown to be associated with post-infectious FD symptoms. ConclusionsInfectious gastroenteritis is associated with an increased risk for subsequent dyspepsia as well as for irritable bowel syndrome. Post-infectious FD and post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome may represent different aspects of the same pathophysiology. Further studies will be needed to determine this.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据