4.7 Review

Review article: the association between nodular regenerative hyperplasia, inflammatory bowel disease and thiopurine therapy

期刊

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
卷 38, 期 9, 页码 1025-1037

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apt.12490

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundNodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) is increasingly being recognised in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, the pathogenesis and incidence of NRH in IBD, and the putative roles played by azathioprine (AZA), mercaptopurine (MP), or tioguanine (TG) remain unclear. AimsTo summarise the data on the association between NRH and thiopurine therapy in patients with IBD. MethodsA literature search was performed in PubMed and MEDLINE databases using the keywords nodular regenerative hyperplasia AND (inflammatory bowel disease OR Crohn's disease OR ulcerative colitis) AND (azathioprine OR mercaptopurine OR tioguanine OR thioguanine).' No time limit was placed on studies included. ResultsInflammatory bowel disease patients treated with AZA have a cumulative incidence of NRH of approximately 0.6% and 1.28% at 5 and 10years, respectively, whereas those treated with high-dose TG (>40mg/day) have a frequency of NRH of up to 62%, which is higher in patients with elevated liver enzymes and/or thrombocytopaenia than those without these abnormalities (frequency 76% vs. 33%). Conversely, low-dose TG therapy (<20mg/day) is relatively safe, with no cases of NRH observed. NRH has also been found in 6% of operated thiopurine-naive IBD patients. Male gender, older age, and stricturing disease/small bowel resection have been consistently identified as high-risk factors for NRH. ConclusionsThe pathogenesis of nodular regenerative hyperplasia in patients with IBD is complex and multifactorial involving disease-specific, genetic and iatrogenic risk factors. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for diagnosing nodular regenerative hyperplasia, especially in IBD patients with high-risk factors on thiopurine therapy, regardless of the presence of laboratory abnormalities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据