4.7 Review

Systematic review: early infant feeding and the prevention of coeliac disease

期刊

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
卷 36, 期 7, 页码 607-618

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apt.12023

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union [FP6-2005-FOOD-4B-36383-PreventCD]
  2. Komitet Nauki [NN407171534, 1715/B/P01/2008/34]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background PREVENTCD, Prevent Coeliac Disease, is an international project investigating the hypothesis of possible induction of tolerance to gluten in genetically predisposed children through introducing small quantities of gluten during the period of breastfeeding. Aim To summarise current knowledge on the possible relationship between early feeding practices and the risk of coeliac disease (CD). Methods The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases were searched in May 2011, and the search was updated in January 2012, and again in July 2012. Results Breastfeeding (BF) and CD: some studies show a protective effect of BF, while others show no effect. No studies have shown a long-term preventive effect. BF at the time of gluten introduction and CD: Results from a meta-analysis of five observational case-control studies suggest that BF at gluten introduction is associated with a lower risk of CD compared with formula feeding. It is unclear whether BF provides a permanent protection or only delays the onset of CD. Timing of gluten introduction: The data suggest that both early (=4 months) and late (=7 months) introduction of gluten may increase the risk of CD. Amount of gluten at weaning (and later) and CD: One incident case-referent study documented that the introduction of gluten in large amounts compared with small or medium amounts increased the risk of CD. Conclusions In the absence of clear evidence, in order to decrease the risk of later coeliac disease, it is reasonable to avoid both early (<4 months) and late (=7 months) introduction of gluten, and to introduce gluten while the infant is still being breastfed. Future studies may clarify the remaining uncertainties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据