4.7 Article

Prognostic factors in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib

期刊

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
卷 34, 期 8, 页码 949-959

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04823.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bayer Schering Pharma
  2. Ms A Lemonidis of 7.4 Limited

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Sorafenib is the new reference standard for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Aim To identify prognostic factors in sorafenib-treated HCC patients and to evaluate outcomes with respect to liver function. Methods In this retrospective study, 148 HCC patients received sorafenib 400 mg b.d. across 11 Austrian institutions. Seventy-eight HCC patients who received best supportive care (BSC) in the pre-sorafenib era served as a control. Results In sorafenib-treated patients, low baseline a-fetoprotein, low Child-Pugh (CP) score, compensated cirrhosis, and low baseline aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were associated with significantly longer overall survival (OS) on univariate analysis. CP score and baseline AST remained independent prognostic factors on multivariate analysis. In patients with Barcelona Clinic liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B or C HCC (sorafenib: n = 139; BSC: n = 39), CP-A patients had a median OS of 11.3 (sorafenib [n = 76]) vs. 6.4 (BSC [n = 17]) months (P = 0.010), and CP-B patients had a median OS of 5.5 (sorafenib [n = 55]) vs. 1.9 (BSC [n = 22]) months (P = 0.021). In the sorafenib group, median OS according to baseline AST was 11.8 (< 100 U/L [n = 58]) vs. 3.9 (100 U/L [n = 15]) months for CP-A patients (P = 0.127), and 6.5 (< 100 U/L [n = 33]) vs. 2.1 (100 U/L [n = 21]) months for CP-B patients (P = 0.011). There was no survival difference between sorafenib and BSC in patients with BCLC stage D HCC (1.5 vs. 1.4 months; P = 0.116). Conclusions Sorafenib was associated with improved survival in both CP-A and CP-B patients. In CP-B patients, baseline AST may be helpful in determining which patients are most likely to benefit from sorafenib. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 34: 949-959

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据