4.7 Article

An investigation of medication adherence to 5-aminosalicylic acid therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis, using self-report and urinary drug excretion measurements

期刊

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
卷 30, 期 11-12, 页码 1118-1127

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04152.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. charity GEAR (Gastrointestinal Education And Research)
  2. Ferring Pharmaceuticals Ltd
  3. Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd
  4. Shire Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>Background Non-adherence to 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) medication can limit the established benefits of this therapy in ulcerative colitis (UC). Aim To determine rates and predictors of non-adherence to 5-ASA therapy in UC patients. Methods Medication adherence was assessed using self-report data and urinary drug excretion measurements. Participants completed a study-specific questionnaire and two validated questionnaires: Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ)-Specific and Satisfaction with Information about Medicines Scale. Results A total of 169 participants provided self-report adherence data; 151 also provided urine samples. Adherence rates were 111/151 (68%) according to self-report and 90/151 (60%) according to urine analysis, but the two measures were not correlated (KH2 = 0.12, P = 0.725). Logistic regression identified a significant association between self-reported non-adherence and younger age [odds ratio (OR) for increased age 0.954, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.932-0.976] and also doubts about personal need for medication (OR for BMQ - Specific Necessity scores 0.578, 95% CI 0.366-0.913). For non-adherence based on urine analysis, only South Asian ethnicity was independently associated with non-adherence (OR 2.940, 95% CI 1.303-6.638). Conclusions Our observations confirm the difficulty of accurately assessing medication adherence. Nonmodifiable (younger age, South Asian ethnicity) and potentially modifiable (medication beliefs) predictors of non-adherence were identified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据