4.7 Article

The citrulline generation test: proposal for a new enterocyte function test

期刊

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
卷 27, 期 12, 页码 1300-1310

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03678.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The amino acid citrulline is mainly produced by enterocytes from conversion of glutamine. As fasting plasma citrulline proved disappointing as a biomarker for enterocyte dysfunction in clinical practice, we propose a citrulline generation test (CGT) to assess enterocyte function. Aim To assess the feasibility of a CGT in healthy subjects and patients with decreased enterocyte mass. Methods Nineteen healthy subjects, 16 patients with intestinal villous atrophy and nine patients with short bowel syndrome (SBS) were given an oral bolus of 20 g of the dipeptide alanine-glutamine. Subsequent changes in plasma citrulline and other amino acid concentrations were determined using reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Results Following the oral bolus of alanine-glutamine, plasma citrulline concentrations showed a time dependent rise in healthy subjects of 44 +/- 13% (38-55 mu mol/L, P < 0.0001). The slope from baseline plasma citrulline to peak concentrations was 0.22 +/- 0.08, 0.13 +/- 0.04 and 0.09 +/- 0.04 mu mol/L/min in healthy subjects, patients with coeliac disease (CeD) and refractory CeD, respectively (healthy subjects vs. CeD P < 0.05, healthy subjects vs. refractory CeD P < 0.001). In patients with SBS, the CGT was able to distinguish between non-adapted and adapted SBS by means of the incremental area under the CGT curve till 90 min (iAUC T90). The iAUC T90 was 447 +/- 179 and 1039 +/- 178 mu mol/L/min in non-adapted and adapted SBS, respectively (P = 0.04). Conclusion An oral bolus of alanine-glutamine induces a time-dependent rise in plasma citrulline concentration to an extent dependent on the existence of villous atrophy or enterocyte hyperplasia in CeD, and adapted SBS, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据