4.7 Article

Relationship between symptom load of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and health-related quality of life, work productivity, resource utilization and concomitant diseases: survey of a US cohort

期刊

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
卷 27, 期 10, 页码 960-970

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03671.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Analysis of the burden of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in relation to the severity and frequency of symptoms is essential to identify individuals and groups in whom targeted management is justified. Aim To describe the relationship between symptoms of GERD and self-reported health-related quality of life (HRQL), work productivity, healthcare utilization and concomitant diseases. Methods US respondents to the Internet-based 2004 National Health and Wellness Survey who had self-reported GERD (n = 10 028, mean age: 52 years, 58% female) were age- and gender-matched to a control group without GERD (n = 10 028). Respondents with GERD were classified according to symptom severity and frequency. HRQL and productivity were assessed using the Short-Form 8 survey (SF-8) and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire, respectively. Results Symptom frequency increased with increasing symptom severity. Compared with controls, respondents with GERD had more concomitant diseases [mean difference (MD): 1.6], lower SF-8 physical and mental health scores (MD: 4.1 units and 3.1 units, respectively), increased absenteeism (MD: 0.9 h/week), reduced percent productivity at work (MD: 7.5%) and increased healthcare utilization. All tested variables deteriorated with increasing symptom severity and/or frequency. Conclusions Increasing severity and frequency of GERD symptoms is associated with more concomitant diseases, lower HRQL, lower work productivity and increased healthcare utilization, suggesting that patients with moderate or severe GERD should receive targeted management with the most effective treatment strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据