4.2 Article

Deletion of Prkcz Increases Intermittent Ethanol Consumption in Mice

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acer.12211

关键词

Protein Kinase C Zeta; Protein Kinase M Zeta; Knockout Mice; Alcohol Consumption; Reward; Ventral Striatum

资金

  1. NIAAA [AA017072]
  2. CIHR
  3. State of California for medical research on alcohol and substance abuse through UCSF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundPrkcz has been identified as a gene whose expression is positively correlated with ethanol (EtOH) consumption in mice and is also induced by EtOH. Two proteins are produced from Prkcz: protein kinase M zeta (PKM), which is expressed in the nervous system and protein kinase C zeta (PKC), which is expressed in other tissues. We examined Prkcz(-/-) mice that lack PKC and PKM to investigate the role of this gene in behavioral responses to EtOH. MethodsMale Prkcz(-/-) and wild-type littermates were tested for EtOH consumption using 4 procedures: 24-hour intermittent access, 4-hour limited intermittent access, 4-day drinking-in-the-dark, and 24-hour continuous access. We also assessed the acute hypnotic effect of EtOH, EtOH reward, and taste preference for sweet-, bitter-, salty-, and umami-flavored solutions. Finally, we determined whether EtOH could increase PKM and PKC transcripts and protein expression in wild-type mice using quantitative PCR and Western blot analysis. ResultsPrkcz(-/-) mice consumed more EtOH than their wild-type littermates in both intermittent access procedures, but not in the drinking-in-the-dark or 24-hour continuous access procedures. EtOH exposure increased Prkcz transcripts in cultured PC12 cells, and intermittent EtOH consumption increased PKM protein in the ventral striatum of wild-type mice. ConclusionsAbsence of PKM in the brain is associated with increased EtOH intake during procedures that incorporate intermittent consumption sessions every other day. Our data suggest that EtOH induces PKM, which acts in a negative feedback loop to limit binge-like EtOH consumption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据