4.2 Article

Persistent but Less Severe Ataxia in Long-Term Versus Short-Term Abstinent Alcoholic Men and Women: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

期刊

ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 35, 期 12, 页码 2184-2192

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01567.x

关键词

Alcoholics; Ataxia; Gait and Balance; Recovery; Extended Abstinence; Cerebellum

资金

  1. National Institutes for Health, NIH [AA013659, AA011311]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Disturbed gait and balance are among the most consistent and salient sequelae of chronic alcoholism. Results of small sample longitudinal investigations have provided evidence that partial recovery of gait and balance functions in alcoholics may be achieved with abstinence. However, abstinence durations reported have been limited, and their power and generalizability have suffered from small sample sizes. Methods: In this study, we employed a cross-sectional approach to assess gait and balance functions in short-term (6 to 15 weeks) abstinent alcoholics (STAA; n = 70) and long-term (minimum 18 months, mean = 7.38 years) abstinent alcoholics (LTAA; n = 82). STAA and LTAA did not differ with respect to lifetime alcohol consumption, family drinking density, or years of education. In addition, we examined the effects of gender and alcohol use variables. Results: Our main findings were: (i) persistent disturbed gait and balance in STAA and disturbed standing balance in LTAA; (ii) overall less impaired performance of LTAA compared with STAA on gait and balance measures; and (iii) worse performance of STAA (but not LTAA) women, compared with men, on standing balance without visual control. Conclusions: Our results suggest that alcoholics' gait and balance can continue to recover with long abstinence from alcohol, but that deficits persist, especially in eyes-closed standing balance. In addition, our results are consistent with more severe alcohol-induced ataxia in women than in men but suggest that with extended abstinence, women recover gait and balance function to a level comparable with men.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据