4.7 Article

Separation, preliminary characterization, and moisture-preserving activity of polysaccharides from Ulva fasciata

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.09.048

关键词

Ulva fasciata polysaccharides; Rheology measurement; Moisture-preserving activity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31301560]
  2. Youth Talent Program of Zhejiang University of Technology
  3. Major Projects for Science and Technology Foundation of Zhejiang Province [2011C12040]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sulfated polysaccharide (UFP31) extracted from the marine algae Ulva fasciata (UFP) was a heteropolysaccharide, and consisted of rhamnose, xylose, and glucose in a ratio of 1:0.46:0.27 with a (1 -> 4)-linked glycosyl backbone. The rheology of UFP31 solution has been investigated by steady shear and small amplitude oscillatory experiments. The effects of concentration, temperature, and time were systematically investigated. Steady-shear rheological measurement in a range of shear rate (1.1000s(-1)) exhibited that UFP31 has a Newtonian behavior in diluted solutions (1.0%, 3.0%, and 5.0%, w/v), dilatant flow behavior at higher concentrations (7.0% and 9.0%, w/v). Specifically, UFP31 solution (7%, w/v) exhibited antithixotropic behavior. In small amplitude oscillatory experiments, both the storage modulus (G') and the loss modulus (G '') of UFP31 solution (7%, w/v) increased with frequency swept but G' increased more quickly. As a consequence, G' tends to overcome G '' at 2.7 Hz. The capability of moisture-absorption and moistureretention of the polysaccharide was also respectively examined gravimetrically in comparison with those of glycerol. It revealed that UFP31 exhibited a higher ability both in the moisture-absorption and moistureretention test throughout the entire experiment. These results clearly establish the possibility that UFP31 could be employed as a new material of nature moisturizer. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据