4.3 Article

Knowledge of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's 2006 Routine HIV Testing Recommendations among New York City Internal Medicine Residents

期刊

AIDS PATIENT CARE AND STDS
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 167-176

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/apc.2008.0130

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In 2006, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) endorsed routine voluntary HIV testing in health care settings to identify the many HIV-infected but undiagnosed persons. Realizing this goal will require primary care providers including internal medicine physicians to order HIV tests routinely. In particular, urban internal medicine trainees who work in high HIV prevalence settings need to adopt this approach. We therefore examined the practice of routine HIV testing and to identify factors that correlate with offering HIV testing to this group. We conducted a self-administered electronic cross-sectional survey of New York City's (NYC) internal medicine residents on HIV testing-related knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors with 29 close-ended questions. Fifteen of 42 NYC internal medicine residency programs participated in early 2007. Of 1175 residents, 450 (38.3%) responded. Most (64.1%) ordered 10 or less HIV tests in the past 6 months; 32.6% were aware of the 2006 guidelines; 35.8% utilized a routine testing approach. Respondents aware of current guidelines were more likely to practice routine testing (odds ratio [OR] 3.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.4-5.6). Two common barriers to testing were procedural: time-consuming consent process (27.1%); difficulty locating consent forms (19.3%). Most (68.4%) respondents indicated that oral consent would facilitate more testing. Most NYC internal medicine residents are not routinely offering HIV tests as advised by the 2006 CDC HIV testing guidelines and continue to test patients according to perceived patient HIV risk. This is likely contributing to their low testing rates. Most identified institutional and policy barriers to routine testing. Efforts should be made to improve dissemination

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据