4.4 Review

p24 revisited: a landscape review of antigen detection for early HIV diagnosis

期刊

AIDS
卷 32, 期 15, 页码 2089-2102

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001982

关键词

biomarker; capsid; diagnostic tests; early detection; HIV; point-of-care

资金

  1. EPSRC i-sense Early Warning Sensing Systems in Infectious Disease [EP/K031953/1]
  2. MRC Global Challenges Research Fund (m-Africa) [MR/P024378/1]
  3. Royal Society Wolfson Merit Award
  4. EPSRC [EP/K031953/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. MRC [MR/P024378/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite major advances in HIV testing, early detection of infection at the point of care (PoC) remains a key challenge. Although rapid antibody PoC and laboratory-based nucleic acid amplification tests dominate the diagnostics market, the viral capsid protein p24 is recognized as an alternative early virological biomarker of infection. However, the detection of ultra-low levels of p24 at the PoC has proven challenging. Here we review the landscape of p24 diagnostics to identify knowledge gaps and barriers and help shape future research agendas. Five hundred and seventy-four research articles to May 2018 that propose or evaluate diagnostic assays for p24 were identified and reviewed. We give a brief history of diagnostic development, and the utility of p24 as a biomarker in different populations such as infants, the newly infected, those on preexposure prophylaxis and self-testers. We review the performance of commercial p24 assays and consider elements such as immune complex disruption, resource-poor settings, prevalence, and assay antibodies. Emerging and ultrasensitive assays are reviewed and show a number of promising approaches but further translation has been limited. We summarize studies on the health economic benefits of using antigen testing. Finally, we speculate on the future uses of high-performance p24 assays, particularly, if available in self-test format. Copyright (C) 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据