4.4 Article

Body composition changes after switching from protease inhibitors to raltegravir: SPIRAL-LIP substudy

期刊

AIDS
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 475-481

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32834f3507

关键词

DXA; lipodystrophy; raltegravir; ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor; treatment switch

资金

  1. Merck Sharp Dohme
  2. Red Tematica Cooperativa de Investigacion en SIDA, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (Spain) [RIS G03/173]
  3. Bristol-Myers-Squibb
  4. Abbott
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim
  6. Gilead
  7. Janssen-Cilag
  8. ViiV
  9. Roche Farma
  10. GlaxoSmithKline
  11. Gilead Sciences
  12. Theratechnologies
  13. Tibotec
  14. ViiV Healthcare
  15. Pfizer
  16. Janssen
  17. Merck
  18. Schering Plough

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To compare 48-week changes in body fat distribution and bone mineral density (BMD) between patients switching from a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) to raltegravir (RAL) and patients continuing with PI/r. Design: Substudy of the prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter SPIRAL study. Methods: Patients were randomized (1 : 1) to continue with the PI/r-based regimen or switch to RAL, maintaining the rest of the treatment unchanged. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and computed tomography scans were performed at baseline and after 48 weeks to measure body fat and bone composition, analyzing intragroup and intergroup differences. Results: Eighty-six patients were included and 74 patients (39 RAL, 35 PI/r) completed the substudy. Significant increases in median [interquartile range (IQR)] visceral adipose tissue (VAT) [20.7 (-2.4 to 45.6) cm(2), P = 0.002] and total adipose tissue (TAT) [21.4 (-1.3 to 55.4) cm(2), P = 0.013] were seen within the PI/r group. No significant changes in body fat were seen with RAL or between treatment groups. Regarding bone composition, total BMD [0.01 (0 to 0.02) g/cm(2), P = 0.002], total hip BMD [0.01 (0 to 0.03) g/cm(2), P = 0.015] and total hip T score [0.12 (-0.05 to 0.21) SD, P = 0.004] significantly increased with RAL, with no significant changes within the PI/r group. Differences between treatment groups were significant in femoral neck BMD [0.01 (-0.02 to 0.02) g/cm(2), P = 0.032] and T score [0.01 (-0.18 to 0.18) SD, P = 0.016]. Conclusion: Although there were no significant changes in body fat between groups, maintaining a PI/r-based regimen was associated with a significant increase in VAT and TAT. Switching to RAL led to a significant increase in femoral neck BMD when comparing between groups. (C) 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health broken vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据