4.4 Article

Risk factors for 'unmasking immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome' presentation of tuberculosis following combination antiretroviral therapy initiation in HIV-infected patients

期刊

AIDS
卷 24, 期 10, 页码 1519-1525

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283396007

关键词

HAART; HIV; IRIS; tuberculosis; unmasking tuberculosis-immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine characteristics and risk factors for unmasking tuberculosis (TB)-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) following initiation of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) in HIV-infected patients, which have not yet been assessed to date. Design: Retrospective single-center cohort study. Methods: Medical records of HIV-infected patients diagnosed with tuberculosis following cART initiation were reviewed. Cases of unmasking IRIS were identified using provisional consensus definitions. Characteristics of patients with and without unmasking TB-IRIS were compared. A case-control design was used to identify risk factors for unmasking TB-IRIS in patients initiating cART. Results: Among 47 patients on cART at TB diagnosis, 11 experienced unmasking IRIS (23%). They had lower CD4% (9 vs. 14, P = 0.02), higher HIV-RNA load at baseline (5.2 vs. 4.0 log, P = 0.005), and a stronger CD4% increase with HIV-RNA decline after 1 month on cART (+7 vs. +3 log, P = 0.02, and -3.2 vs. -0.8 log, P = 0.005) than the 36 remaining patients without unmasking IRIS. In the case-control study, risk factors for unmasking IRIS were African country of origin (65 vs. 18%, P = 0.007), higher baseline HIV-RNA load (5.2 vs. 4.7 log, P = 0.01), stronger CD4% increase (+7 vs. +2, P = 0.0001), and HIV-RNA decline of more than 3 log after 1 month on cART (73 vs. 27%, P = 0.02). Conclusion: Patients with African origins, advanced HIV infection, or a strong response to cART are at greater risk of unmasking TB-IRIS. (C) 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据