3.8 Article

The effect of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy on survival in 1,679 resected pancreatic carcinoma cases in Japan: report of the national survey in the 34th annual meeting of Japanese Society of Pancreatic Surgery

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER TOKYO
DOI: 10.1007/s00534-009-0077-7

关键词

Pancreatic carcinoma; Adjuvant chemotherapy; Gemcitabine; Japanese Society of Pancreatic Surgery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pancreatic carcinoma causes more than 20,000 deaths every year in Japan. The role of (neo-) adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic carcinoma is still controversial. At the 34th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society of Pancreatic Surgery in 2007, questionnaires were distributed regarding the use of (neo-) adjuvant chemo(radio)therapy for pancreatic carcinoma between 2001 and 2005. Sixty of the 146 member institutions responded to the questionnaires. There were a total of 1,846 cases of resected pancreatic carcinoma between 2001 and 2005. The study population had a greater proportion of males, and a mean age of 65.3 years (range 34-90 years). The lesion was located in the head of the pancreas in 1,204 cases (71.7%), in the body in 353 cases (21.0%), and in the tail in 111 cases (6.6%). Overall survival rates were 67.3% at 1 year, 36.0% at 2 years, and 23.9% at 3 years, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy (usually involving gemcitabine) was used in 66.0% of cases. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy was found to improve the overall survival rate. Interestingly, adjuvant chemotherapy only improved survival in late-stage (UICC stages IIB, III, and IV) but not early stage (IA, IB, and IIA) patients. Survival was treatment duration-dependent, with patients who received more than 12 months of therapy having a 3-year survival rate of 51.2%. This high volume retrospective data indicated the promising effect of gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy and the rational duration of adjuvant chemotherapy should be determined in the future prospective studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据