4.4 Article

Spatial Prediction of Soil Organic Matter Content Using Cokriging with Remotely Sensed Data

期刊

SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL
卷 73, 期 4, 页码 1202-1208

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2008.0045

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [40341010]
  2. Department of Science and Technology, Zhejiang Province, China [2006C22026]
  3. China Scholarship Council and the Zhejiang University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurately measuring soil organic matter content (SOM) in paddy fields is important because SOM is one of the key soil properties controlling nutrient budgets in agricultural production systems. Estimation of this soil property at an acceptable level of accuracy is important; especially in the case when SOM exhibits strong spatial dependence and its measurement is a time- and labor-consuming procedure. This study was conducted to evaluate and compare spatial estimation by kriging and cokriging with remotely sensed data to predict SOM using limited available data for a 367-km(2) study area in Haining City, Zhejiang Province, China. Measured SOM ranged from 5.7 to 40.4 g kg(-1), with a mean of 19.5 g kg(-1). Correlation analysis between the SOM content of 131 soil samples and the corresponding digital number (DN) of six bands (Band 1-5 and Band 7) of Landsat Enhanced Thematic Mapper (ETM) imagery showed that correlation between SOM and DN of Band 1 was the highest (r= -0.587). We used the DN of Band I as auxiliary data for the SOM prediction, and used descriptive statistics and the kriging standard deviation (STD) to compare the reliabilities of the predictions. We also used cross-validation to validate the SOM prediction. Results indicate that cokriging with remotely sensed data was superior to kriging in the case of limited available data and the moderately strong linear relationship between remotely sensed data and SOM content. Remotely sensed data such as Landsat ETM imagery have the potential as useful auxiliary variables for improving the precision and reliability of SOM prediction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据