4.6 Article

Robust Identification of Piecewise/Switching Autoregressive Exogenous Process

期刊

AICHE JOURNAL
卷 56, 期 7, 页码 1829-1844

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aic.12112

关键词

process control; statistical analysis'; system identification; robust EM; PWARX/switched system; hybrid system

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A robust identification approach for a class of switching processes named PWARX (piecewise autoregressive exogenous) processes is developed in this article. It is proposed that the identification problem can be formulated and solved within the EM (expectation-maximization) algorithm framework. However, unlike the regular EM algorithm in which the objective function of the maximization step is built upon the assumption that the noise comes from a single distribution, contaminated Gaussian distribution is utilized in the process of constructing the objective function, which effectively makes the revised EM algorithm robust to the latent outliers. Issues associated with the EM algorithm in the PWARX system identification such as sensitivity to its starting point as well as inability to accurately classify un-decidable data points are examined and a solution strategy is proposed. Data sets with/without outliers are both considered and the performance is compared between the robust EM algorithm and regular EM algorithm in terms of their parameter estimation performance. Finally, a modified version of MRLP (multi-category robust linear programming) region partition method is proposed by assigning different weights to different data points. In this way, negative influence caused by outliers could be minimized in region partitioning of PWARX systems. Simulation as well as application on a pilot-scale switched process control system are used to verify the efficiency of the proposed identification algorithm. (C) 2009 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 56: 1829-1844, 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据