4.5 Article

Soil Salinity and Quality of Sprinkler and Drip Irrigated Cool-Season Turfgrasses

期刊

AGRONOMY JOURNAL
卷 103, 期 5, 页码 1503-1513

出版社

AMER SOC AGRONOMY
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2011.0162

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. New Mexico State University's Agricultural Experiment Station
  2. Office for Facilities and Services
  3. Water Resources Research Institute
  4. Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service
  5. U.S. Department of Agriculture [2005-34461-15661, 2005-45049-03209]
  6. Seeds West Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A 3-yr study was conducted in New Mexico to investigate the effects of saline water on changes in quality, cover, and root zone salinity of seven cool-season turfgrasses. Plots were irrigated using either sprinklers or subsurface drip with water of 0.6, 2.0, or 3.5 dS m(-1). From March to November plots were rated monthly for quality, and green cover was determined using digital image analysis. Soil samples were collected at depths of 0 to 10, 10 to 20, and 50 to 60 cm in June and November and analyzed for electrical conductivity (EC), Na, and sodium adsorption ratio (SAR). Changes in soil EC, Na content, and SAR reflected seasonal changes in irrigation and natural precipitation and EC and Na values were highest (6.1 dS m(-1) and 943 mg L(-1), respectively) in June of 2006 on drip irrigated plots at depths of 0 to 10 cm. Electrical conductivity was higher in drip irrigated than sprinkler irrigated plots on four of the six sampling dates. Irrigation type and water quality did not affect EC and Na at soil depths of 50 to 60 cm. For four of the seven grasses tested, EC, Na, or SAR values showed a significant but weak relationship (0.18 < r(2) < 0.27) with turf quality, indicating that more than one stressor affected visual ratings. With the exception of tall fescue [Festuca arundinacea (Schreb.)], cool-season grasses could not be maintained at acceptable quality levels in the arid transitional climate when irrigated with saline water from either a sprinkler or a subsurface drip system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据