4.4 Article

Growth of pruned eucalypt clone in an agroforestry system in southeastern Brazil

期刊

AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS
卷 83, 期 2, 页码 121-131

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10457-011-9432-1

关键词

Green crown pruning; Multiproduct; Plant growth; Silvopastoral system

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento do Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  4. Universidade Federal de Vicosa (UFV)
  5. Votorantim Siderurgia (VS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to identify pruning intensity and frequency that can be applied to eucalypt without imposing growth reduction, in an agroforestry system in Brazil (17 degrees 36' S and 46 degrees 42' W). Pruning treatments included removal of 0, 1/4 and 1/3 of the live crown height (LCH) with or without the removal of some thick branches above this height (TBA), in three or four lifts, which started at 9 months. There was no effect of pruning on tree height. Diameter (dbh) and volume per tree decreased (P <= 0.05) only with the removal of 1/3 of the LCH + TBA, of all trees of the stand, in three lifts, up to 36 months. The Weibull diameter distribution curves showed a higher proportion of trees in the greatest diameter classes with the removal of 1/4 or 1/3 of the LCH + TBA of selected trees, in four lifts, at the age of 36 months. The time required for applying pruning to a height of 6 m did not differ among treatments (P > 0.05). Pruning up to 1/3 of the LCH + TBA of selected trees, in 4 lifts (6-month intervals) is recommended because there was a higher proportion of trees in the greatest diameter classes and the dbh at the time of the last pruning was smaller than for the other treatments, which implies in reduced knotty core. The production of trees with larger diameter and reduced knotty core may increase farmers' income and reduce the pressure on native forests.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据