4.7 Article

Irrigation management, nitrogen fertilization and nitrogen losses in the return flows of La Violada irrigation district (Spain)

期刊

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
卷 155, 期 -, 页码 161-171

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2012.04.004

关键词

Nitrogen use efficiency; Non-point pollution; Fertilization; Nitrate; Nitrogen balance; Irrigation efficiency; La Violada irrigation district

资金

  1. Almudevar Water User Association (Comunidad de Regantes de Almudevar, CRA)
  2. Ebro River Basin Authority (Confederacion Hidrografica del Ebro, CHE)
  3. Spanish Ministry of Science and Education [AGL2006-11860/AGR]
  4. European Regional Development Fund (FEDER)
  5. European Union [INCO CT-2005-015031]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitrogen (N) pollution induced by irrigated agriculture is a significant environmental problem. The main N inputs and outputs were measured or estimated in the semi-arid La Violada irrigation district (Spain). Data on two periods (1995-1998 and 2006-2008) were compared and related to observed changes during the decade in cropping patterns and N fertilization and irrigation management. N fertilization exceeded crop N uptake due to over-fertilization of corn (426 kg N/ha in 1995-1998 and 332 kg N/ha in 2006-2008) and alfalfa (62 kg N/ha). Between the two periods, N fertilization decreased by 56%, primarily due to a change from corn to alfalfa and barley. Accordingly, N losses in the irrigation return flows (IRF) diminished from 31% of the applied fertilizer in 1995-1998 to 20% in 2006-2008. NO3- concentrations and NO3-N loads in the IRF decreased from 40 mg/L and 106 kg N/ha in 1995-1998 to 21 mg/L and 22 kg N/ha in 2006-2008, due to lower N fertilization, lower corn area and improved irrigation efficiency. N contamination in the IRF will be minimized by increasing the irrigation efficiency and decreasing the corn area and its N fertilization rates, particularly when supplemental organic N is applied at pre-sowing. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据